Powered By Blogger

Saturday, January 22, 2011

"New" Old Strategy

I wrote this blog in 2007 when I was a blogger and small owner of www.BAPokerBoss.com. I feel like the information in it is some of the very few strategy tips that are still relevant after four years in this ever-changing poker climate. Also, I am launching a new poker website on February 1st, check it out at www.CaseAcePoker.net, Anyway enjoy and leave me comments if you like. 



Tournament Strategy: Fold Equity

I play the majority of the time at Foxwoods Resort Casino in Ledyard, CT. Foxwoods is home to the WPT's World Poker Room and some of the best cash games on the east coast. Foxwoods is also a mecca for daily tournament poker. Tournaments are run six days a week, three tournaments per day. These tournaments have fast structures and are designed to run from start to finish in about eight hours. For your "nine to fivers" or for people that have responsibilities and schedules outside the casino, this type of structure works just fine. For the rest of us who have more time on our hands and are looking to get some play for our money, the consensus normally is that these types of tournaments are more like glorified crap shoots than anything else.

I both agree and disagree with this mindset. While we don't get to play tournament poker in it's purist form, there is still a way to be successful within this format. I believe that it is important, maybe now more than ever, to understand these strategies as these types of tournaments are becoming more  popular every day. In addition to your local casino(s), you can now find them popping up in bars, private clubs, small poker rooms all of whom are trying to capitalize on the popularity of this phenomenal game.

One major way to succeed is to have a clear understanding of what the average chip stack is and how that equates to the blinds. It is not uncommon for average chip stacks to be less than 10 bets. Keep one thing in mind: if you have the average chip stack than it will always be the average chip stack before it is a short stack. And, while you may feel like your stack has no breathing room because of the actual size of the blinds and antes, it is crucial not to panic because guess what? 95% of the remaining players are in the same situation! The biggest mistake I see in these fast structured tournaments are players who have an average chip stack, yet decide to gamble for their tournament life on a less than favorable situation.

This "unfavorable gamble" brings us to the concept of Fold Equity. 

There are normally two common reasons why we call all-in in pre-flop situations

1.  We pick up a monster (AA, KK, QQ etc.)

2.  We have a lot of chips and therefore can afford to make a marginal call if we are getting the correct pot-odds


Option one is generally unavoidable. Option two, on the other hand, deals with the concept of Fold Equity. 

Fold Equity- is a concept in poker strategy that is especially important when a player becomes short-stacked in a no-limit tournament. It is equity a player can consider him or herself likely to gain if he or she bets. 

It equates to:

Gain in equity if opponent(s) fold x likelihood that opponents fold

The first half of the equation is known because it is whatever share of equity the folding opponent has. The second cannot be known but must be estimated based on reads or previous actions.


Example:

Johnny holds A6. He is heads up with Eddie, who holds 22. The flop is 973 rainbow (no cards of the same suit).

Johnny has pot equity of 31.5%

Eddie has pot equity of 68.5%

- In other words, if there was no further betting, and the players simply turned up their hands and were dealt the turn and river, johnny is 31.5% likely to win.

- If Eddie is 70% likely to fold, Johnny's fold equity is 47.95% (68.5 x .7). Consequently, Johnny can consider that his hand equity if he bets will equal 31.5 + 47.95%, almost 80%.

  

While this concept may be hard to grasp at first, the basic strategy is pretty simple. Before you move your stack in on an opponent with a marginal hand, use the following mental check list to decide whether or not it is a correct time to do so.

Does this player(s) have the ability to make a lay-down
How much is my raise vs. How much my opponent has invested in the pot (If your opponent is calling less than 2.5-3 times what he has invested than it is not correct to move all-in here)
How many chips does my opponent have (If he/she has more than 5 times the total of the bet it is not correct to move all-in here)
How educated is my opponent on this concept? (A better player will be able to pick this off) 

If, after running through this list, the signs point to shove...than you need to shove my friend!!!

Remember, the key to going to the final table on a consistent basis is not picking up big hands at big moments, it's winning important pots at important moments.

When you hear someone say that player X plays a short stack well, what that means is they understand the concept of Fold Equity. Hopefully now you do too!

--------------------------------------------------
Hope you enjoyed this throwback blog entry.

John"TrupQQ" Sep

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

If that’s your best, your best won't do.


In 2000 I walked into a poker room for the very first time; the Foxwoods poker room to be exact. Prior to this experience I had played in plenty of back room and kitchen table games since a very young age. Walking into a real poker room was a life changing experience and I was hooked. This was 3 years before the poker boom ignited a furry of poker. Online poker was still in its infancy and the consensus was clear; online players weren't real card players, it was filled with fish and many people thought it was rigged (not completely untrue...I'm looking at you Russ Hamilton). I was a young man immersed in a culture of older, wiser, smarter grinders and I quickly formed the opinion that online poker was a joke, it was mocked even. Saying someone was an online player was a deep insult and we clambered to get one of these people into a live game.

I have dipped my toe into the pool of online play many, many times over the years, but have never found success. I found that none of the regulars in my games were winners online either. The consensus was that there were just far too many lucky players who did not have to face the shame of looking at their opponents for the games to be beatable. We wrote these players off as having zero talent and an abundance of luck.

Fast forward ten years or so...

The online poker players have taken over the world. World Series of Poker (WSOP) Final tables are younger than they have ever been, youngest bracelet winner records are smashed ever year or every other year and online players are regarded as current greats (Durrrr, Phil Galfond, etc.) The live pros who have turned up their noses at online players still seem set in their ways and new terms have been invented to describe online players. The biggest problem with live players is their unwillingness to adapt to a changing game. They have adapted in the past, but for some reason they refuse to adapt now. In the 70's and 80's players realized that they could wait on situations to bust reckless players, in the 80's and 90's players realized they can take advantage of players sitting and waiting by opening up their games, in 2005 the learning curve took a drastic jump into refining the game statistically, analytically and fundamentally. The old guard was not prepared for the onslaught to come.

There is one simple reason why online players are better than live players all the way around and that reason is that online players are willing to work harder to be better than live players. Online players do coaching, review hand histories and discuss things constantly on message boards. Live players simply do not. The reason why online players are now taking over the live world falls in line with this mentality. An online player is willing to jump into the live world and put in the work necessary to gain success in that realm; were as very few live pros are willing to do the same in the online world. Sure, some live pros will play online, but they rely too heavily on their live experience and ego to do it with any consistent success. You simply cannot compete against online pros that spend hours and hours and hours reading theory and strategy, watching training videos, using Heads Up Display (HUD) software to determine the best way to exploit situations. I would liken it to bringing a knife to a gun fight, but that example is not extreme enough to describe the real disadvantage, it would be more like bringing a Clint Eastwood era six shooter into battle against Neo from The Matrix. It is just too much of an edge to give up. Unless a live player decides to infiltrate the resources available to them they will not only have no success online but they will also soon find themselves extinct from the live world as well. It is natural selection, the strong survive and the weak are eradicated.  Unless you are willing to adapt then you will be nothing more than a cautionary tale in the years to come.

I have decided to dedicate myself to online poker in 2011 to improve my live game. It sounds contradictory but the writing is on the wall. John Duhamel is our World Champion, Joseph Chung and Matt Affleck showed the true live skills of online players and many, many live game pros from years past are just simply absent in today’s climate. Online players also have far more financial resources at their disposal as well, they support one another. I have seen bracelet winners in poker room entry ways attempting to sell watches and commemorative jackets in order to get a stake in that day’s tournament. Meanwhile an unknown live player can post an add on 2+2 for the same event and sell it out without issue (with mark-up rather than expensive make up). I plan on using HEM (HUDS), Poker Stove, various training sites and one on one coaching to grasp many concepts and statics (VPIP, etc) in order to become a winning online player. Once that is accomplished I have no doubt that I will be a force in the live poker world for years to come.

Some pros are also going this route and I commend them for it, but as for the stubborn, older guard, it was nice knowing you.

See you on the felt; live or virtual.

John "TrupQQ" Sep